Alternative Comparison
Build a split engine vs Ocuula
Some teams consider building their own payment split system. Here's what that actually requires.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Build Your Own | Ocuula |
|---|---|---|
| Time to market | Weeks to build, test, and deploy | Ready in hours, sandbox available now |
| Audit trail | Build your own logging system | 7-year immutable logs included |
| Multi-sig approvals | Custom implementation required | Built-in CFO sign-off flows |
| Webhook system | Design retry logic + signatures | Signed, idempotent delivery |
| Rounding precision | Easy to miss pesewa rounding | Guaranteed zero rounding loss |
| Sandbox testing | Mock everything yourself | Live sandbox with real APIs |
Hidden implementation costs
Cost Comparison
| Cost Item | Build Your Own | Ocuula |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering time | 2-4 weeks of dev time | 0 — just integrate |
| Ongoing maintenance | Dedicated engineer for bug fixes | Included in orchestration fee |
| Compliance overhead | PCI + audit trail policies | Non-custodial, minimal scope |
| Opportunity cost | Your best engineers build non-core math | Free to focus on product differentiators |
When to consider building
You might need a custom solution if:
- You need custom recipient logic beyond the 5 presets
- You have existing payment orchestration with significant investment
- Your compliance requirements prevent third-party integrations
FAQ

